Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
99-50877•Williams v. AT&T Corporation
99-50877Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit21.06.2000
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 99-50877
Summary Calendar
_____________________
GERALD WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
AT&T CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
_______________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Western District of Texas
(USDC No. SA-99-CV-45-FB)
_______________________________________________________
June 21, 2000
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by that court’s
order dated August 11, 1999.
Whether the plaintiff’s termination was in 1996 or 1998, his only right to sue letter
-- 1 of 2 --
2
was received by him on April 10, 1997 and he did not file the lawsuit until December 11,
1998. The Texas Supreme Court has held the statutory requirements to be jurisdictional.
Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc., 813 S.W.2d 483, 486 (Tex. 1991). The record is
conclusive and no issue was raised by plaintiff to avoid the judgment that was rendered.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.