United States v. Vega-Vega

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50743
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARTIN LORETO VEGA-VEGA Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. DR-98-CR-609-1
--------------------
June 15, 2000
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Martin
Loreto Vega-Vega has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vega-Vega
has filed a response, asserting that before he entered his guilty
plea, counsel and the prosecutor informed him that the maximum
sentence he would receive was two years and that he was entitled
to a reduction in his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The record is not developed
sufficiently to reach Vega-Vega’s ineffective assistance claim.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 99-50743
-2-
United States v. Navejar, 963 F.2d 732, 735 (5th Cir. 1992).
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --