United States v. Raven

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-41419
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL DWIGHT RAVEN, also known as Red,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. G-95-CR-10-ALL
__________________________________________
August 9, 2000
Before POLITZ, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Michael Dwight Raven (“Raven”) appeals the sentence on remand based on his
conviction of one drug conspiracy count and four substantive counts of possession with
intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base. He contends that the district court erred
by applying the U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) adjustment for possessing a firearm in
connection with a drug offense.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Our review of the record persuades that the imposition of the § 2D1.1(b)(1)
adjustment was not error. See United States v. Vasquez, 161 F.3d 909, 912 (5th Cir.
1998). The sentence is in all respects AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --