United States v. Quintanilla Rodrigue

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-41264
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROEL QUINTANILLA-RODRIGUE, also known as
Roberto Narvaez Rodriguez,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-99-CR-260-1
--------------------
August 23, 2000
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roel
Quintanilla-Rodrigue has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Quintanilla-Rodrigue has received a copy of counsel’s
motion and brief and has not filed a response to the motion to
withdraw. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --