United States v. Chaney

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
____________
No. 99-30933
____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DARRYL W. CHANEY, also known as Gregory W. Chaney,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Middle District of Louisiana
Dist. Ct. No. 99-CR-40-1
September 11, 2000
Before DUHÉ, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Darryl W. Chaney, a/k/a Gregory W. Chaney, is charged with being a convicted felon in
possession of a firearm and being a convicted felon in possession of ammunition, both in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Chaney moved to suppress the ammunition, the gun, and incuplatory

-- 1 of 2 --

-2-
statements. The district court granted the motion to suppress with regard to the ammunition and the
statements but denied it with regard to the gun. The government appeals the district court’s
suppression of the ammunition and t he statements. Finding that the district court rendered its
decision without the benefit of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Illinois v. Wardlow, 120 S.Ct.
673, 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000), we VACATE and REMAND for reconsideration and further findings
in accordance with that decision.

-- 2 of 2 --