Mejia v. Rasberry, et al

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-11065
Conference Calendar
MOSES JOE MEJIA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RASPBERRY, Lieutenant; MEDICAL STAFF,
Middleton Unit; NFN UNDERWOOD, Officer;
JOHN DOE #1, Officer; JOHN DOE #2; NFN HARDEN,
Officer; JOHN DOE, Transit Officer,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:99-CV-87
--------------------
June 15, 2000
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Moses Joe Mejia, Texas prisoner # 792983, challenges the
magistrate judge’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit.
However, because Mejia has not filed a timely notice of appeal
from the magistrate judge’s February 4, 2000, judgment, this
court is without jurisdiction to consider his arguments. See
Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987); Nelson v.
Foti, 707 F.2d 170, 171 (5th Cir. 1983); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1).

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 99-11065
-2-
Mejia did file a timely notice appeal from the magistrate
judge’s denial of his motion for the appointment of counsel, and
the notice of appeal seeks review of that order only. However,
he has failed to brief any argument regarding the denial of
counsel, and the argument is therefore waived. See Yohey v.
Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Because he has
abandoned the sole ground for appeal, Mejia’s appeal is
DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.
1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --