Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
99-10766•Michael Bellis v. City of Garland
99-10766Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit17.07.2000
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-10766
____________
MICHAEL B ELLIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF CARROLLTON, Etc; ET AL,
Defendants
CITY OF CARROLLTON, a Municipal Corporation; KAREN N
BROPHY; LYNN NUNN; LYNN BOLISH; SHIRLEY
ARMSTRONG; MICHAEL DREWRY
Defendants-Appellees.
________________
Case No. 99-10906
________________
MICHAEL B ELLIS
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
CITY OF GARLAND; ROBERT BEASLEY; CHARLES M
HINTON, JR; RON JONES, II; M SHANNON KACKLEY;
MONTRICE SESSION; DEBBIE FREY
Defendants-Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas
July 11, 2000
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant’s motion for leave to file petition for rehearing out of time is GRANTED.
In response to petitioner’s allegation of factual error, the third sentence of the paragraph
beginning on page three of our opinion is modified to read, “Ellis appealed his Garland convictions
to the County Court of Criminal Appeals of Dallas County, which affirmed his conviction. The Court
of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas at Dallas dismissed his subsequent appeal as untimely.”
Additionally, footnote 4 is amended to read, “Ellis claims that Judge Beasley is not entitled
to judicial immunity because he was not properly certified as a judge under Texas law. The County
Court of Criminal Appeals of Dallas County affirmed Judge Beasley’s ruling, implicitly recognizing
it as that of a valid court. The Court of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas at Dallas dismissed Ellis’s
appeal as untimely, also implicitly finding that Judge Beasley had the authority to issue the ruling.
Without any evidence from Ellis that this basic assumption was incorrect, we will not disturb that
finding here.”
With these modifications, the petition for rehearing filed in the above case is DENIED.
IT IS ORDERED.
-- 2 of 3 --
ENTERED FOR THE COURT:
___________________________________
United States Circuit Judge
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.