19-20340•United States v. Chaudhari
19-20340United States Court Of Appeals For The 5th Circuit08.01.2020
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-20340
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
JAGDISHKUMAR CHAUDHARI, also known as Jagdish,
Defendant - Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:16-CR-385-26
Before BARKSDALE, HAYNES, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
*
Jagdishkumar Chaudhari appeals his guilty-plea conviction and
sentence for conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 1956(a)(1)(B)(i) and 1956(h). The district court sentenced him to, inter alia,
108 months’ imprisonment. Chaudhari, however, contends only that he
received ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing because his attorney
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
January 8, 2020
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 19-20340 Document: 00515263690 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2020
No. 19-20340
2
failed to object to the court’s claimed incorrect calculation of the advisory
Sentencing Guidelines sentencing range.
Because trial records “may contain no evidence of alleged errors of
omission, much less the reasons underlying them”, the preferred method for
resolving ineffective-assistance claims is by a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, not a
direct appeal. Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500, 504–05 (2003). Review
on direct appeal, however, is appropriate in the “rare case[]” whose record
provides details about his attorney’s “conduct and motivations”. United States
v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks and
citation omitted).
The record in this instance provides no details about why Chaudhari’s
attorney failed to object. Accordingly, we decline to consider his claim, without
prejudice to his right to pursue it pursuant to § 2255.
AFFIRMED.
Case: 19-20340 Document: 00515263690 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2020
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.