United States, et al v. Marshall

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
March 27, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-30243
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ERIC JOSEPH MARSHALL, also known as Slim,
also known as John Doe,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
(2:03-CR-157-3)
--------------------
Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric Joseph
Marshall has filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Our independent
review of the brief, Marshall’s response, and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

-- 1 of 2 --

2
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Marshall’s “Motion for Withdrawal of Anders
Brief and Appellate Counsel” is DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --