Ozbun v. Schering Corp

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 6, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-30129
Summary Calendar
ANGELA L. OZBUN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SCHERING CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
(1:03-CV-487)
--------------------
Before KING, DeMOSS, and PRADO Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Angela Ozbun (“Ozbun”), acting pro se, filed suit against
Shering Corporation (“Shering”) alleging injuries resulting from
use by Ozbun of Claritin, a product manufactured by Shering which
was defective under the Louisiana Product’s Liability Act statute.
After allowing fifteen months for discovery process to run, Shering
filed a motion for summary judgment which was granted by the
district court. Ozbun appealed to this court.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the reply briefs, the

-- 1 of 2 --

record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record. For the
reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum ruling filed
under date of January 18, 2005, we affirm the judgment entered by
the district court in favor of Shering, entered of even date.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --