Gesamter Gesetzestext
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
November 9, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-10570
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BENIGNO ROBLERO-RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:05-CR-32-ALL
--------------------
Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Benigno Roblero-
Rodriquez raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States
v. Valdez-Sanchez, 414 F.3d 539, 541 (5th Cir. 2005), which held
that the revocation of supervised release is not an “additional
charge” within the meaning of the plea agreement provision
barring the Government from bringing additional charges. The
Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the
judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
-- 1 of 1 --
