Hudson, et al v. Remington Arms Co, et al

04-60635Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit16.05.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 16, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 04-60635
BOYD D. HUDSON, CINDY KAYE HUDSON,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
VERSUS
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC., RACHI HOLDING, INC., E.I. DUPONT
DE NEMOURS & CO., E I. DuPont De Nemours and Company;
JOHN DOES 1-20,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Mississippi
2:02-CV-860
Before DAVIS, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
After reviewing the record in this case and based upon the
briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, we affirm the
district court’s judgment essentially for the reasons stated in its
June 10, 2003 Oral Bench Opinion. See also Bridges v. Metabolife

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Intern., Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2005 WL 65498 (5th Cir. 2005).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.