United States v. Briseno

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
December 14, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-40786
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDUARDO BRISENO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:02-CR-52-1
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eduardo
Briseno has requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Briseno has received a copy of counsel’s motion and
brief and has not filed a response. Our independent review of
the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for
appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --