United States v. St Pe'

04-30717Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit10.03.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
March 10, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-30717
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARK ST. PÉ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:92-CR-459-1-A
--------------------
Before REAVLEY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Mark St. Pé, federal prisoner number 23104-034, is serving a
204-month sentence following his guilty plea to charges of
conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute and
using and carrying a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking
crime. St. Pé seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to
appeal the district court’s order transferring his successive 28
U.S.C. § 2255 motion to this court.
We must examine the basis of our jurisdiction sua sponte
if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 04-30717
-2-
1987). An order transferring a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255
motion to this court is a non-appealable interlocutory order.
See Brinar v. Williamson, 245 F.3d 515, 516-18 (5th Cir. 2001).
This court is without jurisdiction to consider St. Pé’s appeal.
Accordingly, St. Pé’s motion for a COA is DENIED, and the appeal
is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.