United States v. Goad

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
October 22, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-50371
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TOMMIE CURTIS GOAD,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. W-02-CR-147-1
--------------------
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Private counsel appointed to represent Tommie Curtis Goad
has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Goad has filed a
response to the instant motion. Our independent review of the
brief, the response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and
the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 03-50371
-2-
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --