United States v. Urdiera

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1386 U.S. 738 (1967).
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 17, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-40340
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CLETO ANTUNEZ URDIERA,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-02-CR-551-ALL
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Cleto Antunez Urdiera has moved
for leave to withdraw from this direct appeal and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California.1 Antunez Urdiera has received
a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and of the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave

-- 1 of 2 --

2See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.2

-- 2 of 2 --