Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-30452•Pace Shpg Svc Ntwrk v. Ocean D MV
03-30452Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit11.05.2004
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
May 11, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
______________________
No. 03-30452
______________________
PACE SHIPPING SERVICES NETWORK, S.A.
Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
versus
OCEAN D, M/V her engines, tackle, apparel, etc. formerly known as Haight M/V
Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
OCEAN PRIDE COMPANY LTD
Claimant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
___________________________________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Louisiana
(USDC No. 00-0475)
___________________________________________________
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
After this case was set for oral argument, the parties filed a joint motion stating that “the
parties wish to waive oral argument in this matter and submit it on the briefs, exhibits, and the record
herein.” Upon reviewing the briefs, exhibits, and the record, we conclude that the parties have not
raised any pertinent questions of law; and that the multiple factual issues disputed by the parties were
-- 1 of 2 --
decided by the district court without clear error, for the reasons assigned by the district court.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.