Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-21109•Johnson v. Hodges, et al
03-21109Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit07.04.2004
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 7, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-21109
Summary Calendar
GORDON JOHNSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
LAWRENCE HODGES, Warden II; CHARLES WILLIAMSON, Assistant
Warden; RICHARD GUNNELS, Major; CRAIG FISHER, Captain;
MR. ROSADO, Lieutenant; MONTGOMERY, Lieutenant; J. GUTIERREZ,
Sergeant; B. CARDOZA, UGI Sergeant; V. J. GREIGER, Correction
Officer; V. WILLIS KING, Correction Officer; GAIL THOMPSON,
Law Library Supervisor; W. TAYLOR, Counsel Substitute; D.
COLE, Warden I; M. MUNSELLE, Assistant Warden; JAMIE BAKER,
Major; FREDERICK MERIDA, Captain; JOE PONDER, Captain; D.
SNODGRASS; NELDA BUEHLER, UGI; ANTONIOUS FLANAGAN,
Correctional Officer IV; W. SMITH, Correctional Officer IV;
KELLI WARD, RGN V Griv INV; JANE M. COCKERHAM, Ombudsman;
FRANK HOKE, ACT Administrator,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-03-CV-3672
--------------------
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gordon Johnson, Texas prisoner # 748915, appeals from the
district court’s pre-trial order striking his original civil
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 03-21109
-2-
rights complaint and directing him to file an amended, concise
complaint. This court does not have jurisdiction over this
appeal. See Click v. Abilene Nat’l Bank, 822 F.2d 544, 545 (5th
Cir. 1987). The collateral order doctrine does not apply to the
present case. See Exxon Chems. Am. v. Chao, 298 F.3d 464, 469
(5th Cir. 2002). Johnson’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.