Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
03-10638•Goff v. Soundolier Div
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
February 4, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 03-10638
Summary Calendar
GLADYS MARIE GOFF
Plaintiff - Appellant
VERSUS
SOUNDOLIER DIVISION OF AMERICAN TRADING AND PRODUCTION
CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Northern District of Texas
3:98-CV-2254
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff, Gladys Marie Goff, filed this action against
defendant seeking relief for employment discrimination. The
district court dismissed Golf’s action with prejudice on February
15, 2001 and entered final judgment that same date. Goff filed her
-- 1 of 2 --
2
notice of appeal more than two years later on June 25, 2003.
Because Goff’s notice of appeal from the February 15, 2001 judgment
was untimely this court has no jurisdiction to review that order.
Goff then filed a motion for leave to reinstate her complaint on
February 14, 2003. The district court treated that motion as a
motion for relief under Rule 60(b)F.R.C.P. and denied the motion on
June 19, 2003. Goff filed a timely appeal from that order.
After reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties we
are satisfied that the district court did not abuse its discretion
in denying Goff’s Rule 60(b) motion.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.