Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
02-60390•Hamad v. CIR, et al
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
No. 02-60390
Summary Calendar
_______________________
RIAD ELSOH HAMAD,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Decision
of the United States Tax Court
(7748-01)
_________________________________________________________________
November 26, 2002
Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:*
The appellant challenges the validity of the U.S. Tax
Court’s decision entered after the appellant filed an amended tax
return. Because the appellant does not cite any authority in
support of his position, this Court considers the challenge
abandoned for being inadequately briefed. L&A Contracting Co. v.
-- 1 of 2 --
S. Concrete Servs., Inc., 17 F.3d 106, 113 (5th Cir. 1994);
F.R.A.P. 28(a)(9)(A).
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.