United States v. Scheidt

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 25, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-50033
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT JONATHON SCHEIDT,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. P-00-CR-400-3
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Attorney David G. Rogers, appointed to represent Robert
Jonathon Scheidt on appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw and a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Scheidt has responded to Attorney Rogers’s motion and brief.
Scheidt moves pro se to dismiss his appeal conditionally or,
in the alternative, to consolidate his appeal with appeal
no. 01-50796; Scheidt’s motion to dismiss is DENIED and his

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-50033
-2-
motion to consolidate is DENIED. Scheidt petitions for
“judicial review”; Scheidt’s petition is DENIED.
Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Scheidt’s
response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --