United States v. Rodriguez-Flores

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 24, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-41216 c/w
No. 02-41235
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ABEL RODRIGUEZ-FLORES,
also known as Evelio Rodriguez-Flores,
also known as Antonio Hernandez-Flores,
also known as Antonio Ortiz-Romo,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-02-CR-328-1
USDC No. B-02-CR-154-1
--------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Abel
Rodriguez-Flores has filed a motion for leave to withdraw as
counsel and a brief in support in accordance with Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Rodriguez-Flores has
received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the record indicates that
there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-41216 c/w 02-41235
-2-
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --