United States v. Booker

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40525
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DONNIE DARRELL BOOKER; PABLO RUIZ;
CEDRIC CATLIN,
Defendants-Appellants.
--------------------
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:01-CR-32-7
--------------------
December 16, 2002
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Robert E. Richardson, Jr., court-appointed appellate counsel
for defendant Cedric Catlin, has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Catlin has filed a response to counsel’s motion.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-40525
-2-
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2. Catlin’s motion for leave to file a pro se appellate
brief is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-
03 (5th Cir. 1998).
ANDERS MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION FOR
PERMISSION TO PROCEED PRO SE DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --