Roussel, et al v. Bossier City, et al

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
August 7, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
In the
United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
_______________
m 02-30965
_______________
CARL ROUSSEL
AND
LYN ROUSSEL,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
VERSUS
MUNICIPALITY OF BOSSIER CITY; DAVID JONES; DON WILLIAMS;
JEFFREY DARBY; P.O. DEPRANG; FAYE RAWLS; JAMES W. ROGERS, DR.,
Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
m 99-CV-1551
_________________________

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DUHÉ,
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The plaintiffs bring various constitutional
and state law claims regarding the denial of
their applications to operate a sexually orient-
ed business. After a bench trial, the district
court concluded that the ordinance at issue
was a valid time, place, and manner regulation,
and entered judgment for defendants.
We have read the briefs and pertinent
portions of the record and have heard the ar-
guments of counsel. On the basis of well set-
tled law in this circuit and in the Supreme
Court, the judgment is AFFIRMED, essential-
ly for the reasons given by the district court.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has
determined that this opinion should not be pub-
lished and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

-- 2 of 2 --