Jackson v. Jackson, et al

02-30638Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit14.02.2003

Gesamter Gesetzestext

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-30638
USDC No. 01-CV-564-D
RUNDY JACKSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
SAMMIE JACKSON; TURNER WILLIAMS; EAIRS SANDERS; JEFF MCCOY;
CHAD BORDELON; STATE OF LOUISIANA,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Louisiana
--------------------
February 13, 2003
Before GARWOOD, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rundy Jackson, Louisiana state prisoner # 418058, appeals
from the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. “This Court must examine the basis
of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” Mosley v.
Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). “A timely filed notice
of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to [this court’s]
review.” Dison v. Whitley, 20 F.3d 185, 186 (5th Cir. 1994).

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-30638
-2-
Jackson’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. See FED. R. APP.
P. 4(a)(1)(A). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this
appeal, and it is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.