Gesamter Gesetzestext
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
June 25, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-11224
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ADAM ROSALES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:01-CR-161-1-Y
--------------------
Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Adam
Rosales, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Rosales has not filed a response to counsel’s motion and brief.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
