United States v. Richardson

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-10871 & 02-10872
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
L. D. RICHARDSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:92-CR-108-1-C
--------------------
February 25, 2003
Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender (FPD), appointed to represent
appellant L. D. Richardson, has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Richardson has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, the FPD is excused from

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 02-10871
-2-
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --