Hamad v. INS, et al

01-60767Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit07.06.2002

Gesamter Gesetzestext

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-60767
Summary Calendar
ABDEL QADER HAMAD,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A29 916 089
--------------------
June 6, 2002
Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Abdel Qader Hamad petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals' decision dismissing his appeal from the
immigration judge's decision to deny his application for asylum and
for a withholding of deportation. He argues that the Board erred
by determining that he did not have a well-founded fear of future
persecution in Kuwait. We have reviewed the record and the briefs
and determine that the Board's decision is supported by substantial

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-60767
-2-
evidence. See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS, 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir.
1996). The petition for review is DENIED.
DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.