United States v. Provencio-Barraza

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
April 24, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-41354
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RUBEN PROVENCIO-BARRAZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-01-CR-429-1
--------------------
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed by the district court to represent Ruben
Provencio-Barraza (“Provencio”) on appeal has requested leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Provencio has received a
copy of counsel’s motion but has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-41354
-2-
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See
5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --