United States v. Reeves

1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20657
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID ALLAN REEVES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CR-835-1
--------------------
February 6 2002
Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:1
David Allan Reeves appeals his guilty-plea conviction for bank
robbery and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence.
Reeves argues that the district court erroneously informed him that
he faced a maximum three-year term of supervised release at his
guilty-plea hearing, but then sentenced Reeves to five years of
supervised release.
We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the
parties and hold that the district court’s plea admonishment that
Reeves faced a maximum three-year supervised release term was
harmless error. See United States v. Bachynsky, 934 F.2d 1349,
1359-60 (5th Cir. 1991) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.

-- 1 of 1 --