Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
01-20186•United States v. Cortez
01-20186Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit09.01.2002
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20186
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
VERSUS
ANTONIO ISAURO CORTEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division
(Criminal No. H-CR-00-650)
January 8, 2002
Before DeMOSS, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM: *
O R D E R:
Court-appointed counsel for Antonio Cortez has filed a motion
to withdraw and an accompanying brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel has not, however,
-- 1 of 2 --
2
fulfilled the requirements of Anders.
Anders established standards for an appointed attorney who
seeks to withdraw from a direct criminal appeal on the ground that
the appeal lacks an issue of arguable merit. After a
“conscientious examination” of the case, the attorney must request
permission to withdraw and must submit a “brief referring to
anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal.”
Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. The attorney must isolate “possibly
important issues” and must “furnish the court with references to
the record and legal authorities to aid it in its appellate
function.” United States v. Johnson, 527 F.2d 1328, 1329 (5th Cir.
1976).
Counsel has failed to obtain and file a copy of the transcript
of Cortez’s sentencing hearing, without which this court cannot
conduct a “full examination of all the proceedings.” See Anders,
386 U.S. at 744. Accordingly, his motion to withdraw is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of the sentencing transcript
be obtained for inclusion in the record. See 18 U.S.C. §
3006A(d)(6).
IT IF FURTHER ORDERED that, within 40 days after the filing of
said transcript, counsel must submit either a regular appellate
brief or an adequate Anders brief with a renewed motion for leave
to withdraw.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.