Gesamter Gesetzestext
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-11220
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODDRICK REED,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:01-CR-73-1-Y
- - - - - - - - - -
June 18, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Roddrick Reed has moved to
withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Reed was notified of counsel’s
motion and brief, and he has filed a pro se response. Our
independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Reed’s
response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
