Gesamter Gesetzestext
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-11078
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY KING, SR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:01-CR-57-2-A
--------------------
September 12, 2002
Before JOLLY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Anthony King, Sr., has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). King has received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Our
review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
-- 1 of 2 --
No.
-2-
R. 42.2.
-- 2 of 2 --
