Holloway, et al v. City of Jackson, et al

00-60056Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit29.08.2000

Gesamter Gesetzestext

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-60056
Conference Calendar
JOE LEE HOLLOWAY; ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
JOE LEE HOLLOWAY; SALLY ANN HOLLOWAY; SANDRA CARR; JOHN CARR,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI; ET AL.,
Defendants,
CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI; HARVEY JOHNSON, in his capacity as
Mayor of the City of Jackson; BRACY COLEMAN, in his capacity as
Chief of Police of the City of Jackson; VERA WRIGHT, in her
official capacity as a 911 operator with the Department of Public
Safety Communications with the City of Jackson,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3:99-CV-354-LN
--------------------
August 24, 2000
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The plaintiffs appeal the district court’s grant of summary
judgment and dismissal in favor of fewer than all of the
defendants. Claims against Vera Wright were dismissed but later

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 00-60056
-2-
reinstated. Claims against Mobile Medic Ambulance Service, Inc.,
have not been dismissed. The plaintiffs contend that the
district court’s decision dismissing some of the defendants in
the matter was a final decision on the merits in reference to the
City of Jackson and its officers.
The district court’s ruling did not end the litigation on
the merits and did not dispose of all of the claims against all
of the defendants. See Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S.
463, 467 (1978); Dardar v. Lafourche Realty Co., 849 F.2d 955,
957 (5th Cir. 1988); Save the Bay, Inc. v. United States Army,
639 F.2d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir. 1981); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). The
order was not a final order, and it is not an appealable
interlocutory order. Finally, the order was not certified as a
partial final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b). See Dillon v.
Mississippi Military Dep't, 23 F.3d 915, 917 (5th Cir. 1994).
Accordingly, this court lacks appellate jurisdiction, and the
appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.