Lopez, et al v. County of Hidalgo

1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
___________________________
No. 00-40705
Summary Calendar
___________________________
GERARDO LOPEZ; ET AL,
PlaintiffS,
GERARDO LOPEZ; ERASMO ANZALDUA; LIZA MURILLO;
MIGUEL A. BARRERA; ROGELIO BUENO BARRERA; ET AL,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
RAYMOND T. CRUZ; JUAN DE LOS SANTOS; RICHARDO GALLARDO;
RENE R. GARZA; JESSIE RODRIGUEZ; ET AL,
Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellants,
VERSUS
COUNTY OF HIDALGO, TEXAS,
Defendant-Intervenor Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Texas, McAllen Division
May 22, 2001
Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:1
Following a review of the record, we find that we are
without jurisdiction over this appeal for the following reasons:

-- 1 of 2 --

First, the order referenced in the Notice of Appeal, specifically
the “Granting of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, of
January 7, 2000,” is not a final order disposing of all claims of
all parties before the District Court and was not designated as a
final order by the District Court pursuant to Rule 54(b),
F.R.C.P. Second, the Order of Dismissal entered by the District
Court on May 19, 2000, disposing of the claims of the remaining
twelve plaintiffs, does not satisfy the requirements of Rule 58
that the judgment be set forth in a separate document.
Because no appealable judgment has been entered, this appeal
is DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --