Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
99-7712•In re: Nathaniel Hampton Jones
99-7712Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit03.03.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7712
In Re: NATHANIEL HAMPTON JONES,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel Hampton Jones, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel H. Jones filed this petition for a writ of mandamus
requesting this court to intervene in South Carolina state court
proceedings. Because we have no general power to compel action by
state officials, we deny the petition. See Davis v. Lansing, 851
F.2d 72, 74 (2d Cir. 1988). We deny the motion for leave to pro-
ceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.