United States of America v. Ontario Lamar Gainey

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7603
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ONTARIO LAMAR GAINEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CR-94-68, CA-99-89-4-H)
Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 17, 2000
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ontario Lamar Gainey, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ontario Lamar Gainey seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. The basis for the
claim Gainey seeks to raise was known to him at the time of sen-
tencing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal because the § 2255 motion was not timely filed.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --