Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
99-7110•Donald Wells v. Major Townsend
99-7110Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit07.06.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7110
DONALD WELLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MAJOR TOWNSEND; DONALD HICKS, Sergeant; CAP-
TAIN SMITH; C. D. LARSEN, Warden; J. BERRY,
Sergeant; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-99-42-3)
Submitted: May 23, 2000 Decided: June 7, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Wells, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant At-
torney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Wells, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s
order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West
Supp. 2000) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative reme-
dies under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Wells v. Townsend, No. CA-99-42-3 (E.D. Va. July 21,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.