Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
99-6820•Edward Powell v. D. A. Braxton
99-6820Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit10.01.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6820
EDWARD POWELL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
D. A. BRAXTON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-98-522)
Submitted: December 29, 1999 Decided: January 10, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel John Munroe, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Powell appeals the district courts order denying relief
on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. See Powell v. Braxton, No. CA-98-522 (E.D.
Va. May 12, 1999). We also deny Powell’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.