Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
99-2589•Thomas W. Furlow, Jr v. United States of America
99-2589Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit29.03.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2589
THOMAS W. FURLOW, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
98-2394-CCB)
Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas W. Furlow, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Anemojanis
Holton, Jeffrey Ronald Meyer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas W. Furlow, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of the August 23, 1999
order, which directed that the government issue him a refund of
$742 for the 1997 tax year and denied Furlow’s motion to reconsider
the court’s July 6, 1999 order granting summary judgment in favor
of the government as to Furlow’s claimed refund for the 1996 tax
year. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea-
soning of the district court. See Furlow v. United States, No. CA-
98-2394-CCB (D. Md. Oct. 1, 1999). To the extent that Furlow seeks
review of the orders of July 6 and December 22, 1999, those orders
are not properly before this court. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-
sional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.