Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
99-2523•John J. “swartz” Trent v. Wset
99-2523Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.01.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2523
JOHN J. “SWARTZ” TRENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
WHEELER PARTY,
Plaintiff,
versus
WSET; WDBJ; WSLS; THE NEWS AND ADVANCE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (CA-99-80-6)
Submitted: January 13, 2000 Decided: January 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John J. Trent, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John J. “Swartz” Trent appeals the district court’s order
granting in forma pauperis status and dismissing the complaint for
failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Trent v. WSET,
No. CA-99-80-6 (W.D. Va. Nov. 16, 1999). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.