Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
99-2424•Christine Solem v. J. CARLTON COURTER, III, Commissioner of Agri- culture
99-2424Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit20.03.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2424
CHRISTINE SOLEM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. CARLTON COURTER, III, Commissioner of Agri-
culture and Consumer Services,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (CA-99-2-3)
Submitted: February 22, 2000 Decided: March 20, 2000
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christine Solem, Appellant Pro Se. John Charles Wilkinson, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Big Stone Gap, Vir-
ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christine Solem appeals from the district court’s order dis-
missing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Solem v.
Courter, No. CA-99-2-3 (W.D. Va. Sept. 20, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.