Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
99-2128•Muzio B. Roberto v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, A Body Corporate Politic
99-2128Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit28.01.2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2128
MUZIO B. ROBERTO; MARY K. ROBERTO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, A Body Corporate
Politic; JOHN B. LEWIS; DAVID FALCINELLI,
Officer; JOSEPH F. NAPOLI; MARION S. NAPOLI;
MONIQUE HAFREY; MATTHEW W. BLACK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-99-1873-AW)
Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muzio B. Roberto, Mary K. Roberto, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Muzio B. Roberto and Mary K. Roberto appeal from the district
court’s orders dismissing their civil action and denying their mo-
tion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Roberto v.
Montgomery County, No. CA-99-1873-AW (D. Md. July 7 & Aug. 11,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.