Brickwood Contractors, Incorporated v. Cignatta

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1818
BRICKWOOD CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DATANET ENGINEERING, INCORPORATED; JOHN V.
CIGNATTA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-98-
1265-AMD)
Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: March 21, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James J. Tansey, Washington, D.C.; James A. Cleaver, ALEXANDER &
CLEAVER, P.A., Fort Washington, Maryland, for Appellant. James F.
Lee, Jr., Brandon M. Gladstone, LEE & MCSHANE, P.C., Washington,
D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* Although the district court’s order is marked as "filed" on
May 10, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered
on the docket sheet on May 11, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and
79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that
the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet that we take
as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson
v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).
2
PER CURIAM:
Brickwood Contractors, Inc., appeals from the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on its defamation
action. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion
discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea-
soning of the district court. See Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v.
Datanet Engineering, Inc., No. CA-98-2165-AMD (D. Md. May 11,
1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --