Dan K. Dunn v. Westinghouse Savannah River Company

99-1471Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit25.02.2000

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1471
DAN K. DUNN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-97-2213-1-6BC)
Submitted: December 30, 1999 Decided: February 25, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard E. Miley, North Augusta, South Carolina, for Appellant.
Jonathan P. Pearson, James H. Fowles, III, ELLZEY & BROOKS, L.L.C.,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dan K. Dunn appeals the district court's order granting sum-
mary judgment in his former employer's favor in this employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the parties' briefs, the
joint appendices, and the district court's opinion accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Dunn v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co., No. CA-97-
2213-1-6BC (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.