United States of America v. Roosevelt Broadus, a/k/a Supreme

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7807
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROOSEVELT BROADUS, a/k/a Supreme,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CR-91-209-G, CA-97-965-1)
Submitted: May 19, 2000 Decided: June 1, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cheryl Johns Sturm, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, for Appellant.
Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greens-
boro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Roosevelt Broadus seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Broadus, Nos. CR-91-209-G; CA-97-965-1
(M.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --