In re: Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr.

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1257

In re: ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:19-cv -00198-GMG)

Submitted: June 18, 2020 Decided: August 18, 2020

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district
court has unduly delayed in ruling in his civil suit. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the
district court recently dismissed Hairston’s suit. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus
petition and deny Hairston’s motion in objection. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED