Dmitry Pronin v. CHARLES WRIGHT, “Chuck”; NEAL URCH; L. BLACKWELL

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6780
DMITRY PRONIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES WRIGHT, “Chuck”; NEAL URCH; L. BLACKWELL,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
ASHLEY MCCANN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:16-cv-03635-HM)
Submitted: October 23, 2019 Decided: November 15, 2019
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dmitry Pronin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dmitry Pronin appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Pronin v. Wright, No. 5:16-cv-03635-HMH (D.S.C.
May 13, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --