Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-6481•Antwon Whitten v. ATIF ATYIA, Medical Doctor Lonesome Pine Hospital
19-6481Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit12.09.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6481
ANTWON WHITTEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ATIF ATYIA, Medical Doctor Lonesome Pine Hospital; LESLIE FLEMING,
Warden Wallens Ridge State Prison; DAVID ANDERSON, Major Wallens Ridge
State Prison; REBECCA D. KELLY, Registered Nurse Lonesome Pine Hospital;
BILLIE COWDEN, Lab Tech Lonesome Pine Hospital; B. J. RAVIZEE, WRSP
Institutional Ombudsman; DR. R. DULANEY, WRSP Doctor; J. B. MESSER,
R.O.S.P. Institutional Ombudsman,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
WELMONT HEALTH SYSTEMS; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS STATE OF VA. INSURER; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS HEALTH SERVICES,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:17-cv-00465-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: August 29, 2019 Decided: September 12, 2019
Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antwon Whitten, Appellant Pro Se. James Noe Lucas Humphreys, HUNTER, SMITH &
DAVIS, LLP, Kingsport, Tennessee; Rebecca Joyce Ketchie, Andrew Todd Wampler,
WILSON WORLEY, PC, Kingsport, Tennessee; Susan A. Waddell, GUYNN WADDELL
CARROLL & LOCKABY, P.C., Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Antwon Whitten appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Defendants on his claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985(3) (2012), declining to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims, and dismissing those claims without
prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm. Whitten v. Atyia, No. 7:17-cv-00465-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2019). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.