Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-2083•L. Ruther v. Archdiocese Catholic; Edward T. O’meara
19-2083Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit19.12.2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-2083
L. RUTHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARCHDIOCESE CATHOLIC; EDWARD T. O’MEARA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00654-JAG)
Submitted: December 17, 2019 Decided: December 19, 2019
Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as
frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. Archdiocese
Catholic, No. 3:19-cv-00654-JAG (E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 2019). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.